Sydney Bike Plan. Shared Pavements. 500% increase in cyclists over 10 years

 

From Sydney Morning Herald 

Sunanda Creagh
December 2, 2008 - 1:26PM

( to see the original artical with picture from plan, go to: 

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/sydney-bike-plan-shared-pavements/20...

Pedestrians will have to share the pavement with cyclists under
a bike path plan the City of Sydney council is considering for a
busy CBD street.

Under the proposal, the College Street footpath between
Liverpool and Macquarie streets would be widened to 2.4 metres and
shared between walkers and bike riders, resulting in the loss of 52
parking spots.

At least 12 cyclists have been hit by cars or trucks on College
Street between 2003 and 2007.

A council spokesman said the shared pathways would not have a
painted line to separate bikes from pedestrians.

Cyclists would be encouraged to keep to the left, whether they
were travelling north or south.

"The general rule is to keep to the left. It will slow all the
traffic down and everyone will mingle at the same speed. There
won't be a line on the ground so it will take a bit of
understanding from everyone involved," he said.

The shared pathway model will require "a cultural change, a
behavioural change from pedestrians, cyclists and motorists", said
the council's director of City Projects, Michael Leyland and will
be considered by the council on December 15.

Councillor John McInerney, chair of the council's traffic
committee, called for riders to stick to a 10kmh speed limit on the
shared path.

"Of course, there will always be the odd rogue cyclist or even
the rogue pedestrian," he said.

"But we want to mirror the European experience."

Harold Scruby from the Pedestrian Council said the plan would
endanger walkers.

"I think we should offer $1000 prize money to the first person
to see a cyclist doing 10kmh," he said.

"The long-term outcome will be that many pedestrians will be
seriously injured and some will be killed."

The City of Sydney, flush with cash compared with other
councils, is spending $70 million over four years on a cycling
strategy, which will result in 55 kilometres of dedicated separated
bike paths.

Construction on Sydney's first bi-directional, separated bike
path has already begun in King Street in the CBD and plans for a
similar facility on Bourke Street will be revised, after residents
complained about the removal of trees.

The revised plan, under which fewer trees will be removed, will
be assessed by the council this month and construction is expected
to begin in June next year.

"We are expecting 350 bikes per hour on Bourke Street within 10
years," Cr McInerney said.

Designs for a new path along Union Street in Pyrmont are on the
council's website.

Another separated bike path is proposed for Missenden Road,
Camperdown.

The two-way cycle paths, to be painted green and separated from
the car lane by a row of bollards, are also planned for Newtown,
Glebe, Redfern, Zetland, Darlington and Alexandria.

This style of path will constitute 35 kilometres of the
council's promised 55 kilometres of cyclepaths.

The paths will not result in fewer car lanes but will mean the
loss of 166 parking spots "but that's within the context of 30,000
spaces in the city", Cr McInerney said.

The council is also considering introducing a European style
bike rental service in the CBD but would have to factor helmet hire
into the plan.

The council is aiming for a 500 per cent increase in cycling
over 10 years.

Alex Unwin from Bicycle NSW said increased cycling would
increase "the levels of community health ... while addressing the
great issue of our times, global warming".

Also go to :  http://www.copenhagenize.com/ to see some comments on this.

 Alan Preston

 

Why the system will work!!

The speed limit is very important. Some people don't mind traveling at 10 km/hr. These people will be relatively safe as they are going slow enough to stop and they have security in numbers. They will very quickly get used to negotiating pedestrians. They will be traveling at the speed of a run. When it gets congested they will be forced to slow down. The problem with it is that there may be the odd accident as a result of mixing different speed traffic (pedestrians and motorists at intersections and driveways).

When a cyclist wants to go faster and wants to not have the difficulties of negotiating pedestrians they will move onto the road. Without the narrowness, speed limit etc Cyclists may not be tempted to make the change to the road. Cyclists would be increasingly unsafe the faster they went on the path. Particularly where pedestrians and Motorists cross their path.

The system they are talking about will effectively ween people from the path to the road.
The strengths of the plan is its convenience (off the road) and it's inconvenience (narrow, speed limit and shared).

I would like to suggest that this system will be more effective then a cycle path in many instances. It relies on there being enough potential cyclists that are happy riding at that speed that wouldn't ride on the road otherwise. As Fiona pointed out its only a small part in Sydney's plan to increase cycling in City. In my opinion it is a good one, provided they can actually manage to get cyclists to keep to the speed limit and they actually achieve the numbers.

Title of article is misleading

Hi this is an interesting article esp. given my comment today re apparent pedestrian hit by cyclist in Hagley Park (see agenda for Spokes CCC meeting).
The Title of this article is misleading despite the fullstop. As it is not the shared path that The City of Sydney are seeing to cause the 500% increase in cycling but a number of measure from their million dollar ($70 million over 4 years) Cycling Strategy, which it appears is mostly to be spent on on-road segregated from cars cycling facilities.
Austroads 14 (Australian and NZ Guidelines)recommended width for shared path facilities in the circumstances proposed should be at least 3m (compared to proposed 2.4 metres). If it is to go ahead I think the cyclists should be on the road side of path (as gives more buffer from cars for them, but I just do not agree with this concept.

The Danish View of this.

See

 copenhagenize

Keith Turner

Spokes Canterbury Newsletter

Stay informed on our latest news!

Syndicate content

User login

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 38 guests online.