Tram Extension Project Parking and Street Modifications

CCC consultation over aspects of the tram extension to Poplar Lane and Tuam/ High Streets.  Mainly appears to be about impacts on car parking, but may be an opportunity to address improved cycling access across the Lichfield/ Manchester intersection for those travelling along High Street.

There is a plan of the proposed route at:  http://resources.ccc.govt.nz/files/haveyoursay/10-213538-Tram-PIL-April2... . Submissions close on 30 April 2010.

Spokes has made the following submission:

Dear Christine

This is a submission from Spokes - the Canterbury Cycling Association.  Thanks for the opportunity to comment on these proposals.

Because of its alignment, linkages to other streets, and connection between the city centre and CPIT, High Street is an important cycling route in the central city.  There is considerable potential for cycling use to increase along this route as more people take up cycling, the cycling network is improved and proposals to make the central city more cycling friendly are implemented.  The High street is also an important pedestrian route.

Spokes is concerned that the proposed tram extension project may compromise the qualities of High Street and Tuam Street for cycling.  Two specific issues of concern are the installation of tram tracks (particularly curved tracks which have proved problematic in Armagh St) giving rise to cycling accidents, and what appears to be a lack of provision for cyclists between moving trams and parked cars.  While we accept that Council has made a decision to extend the tram into this area, we consider that both these issues need to be addressed in the final design of the scheme.

Spokes also considers that, given the extent of street works involved, the project should address improvements to cycling access across the Lichfield/ Manchester Street intersection in order to provide a more direct connection between the two sections of High Street.  We sought such provisions in our submission on the tramway extension along High Street from Cashel Street, but were told that this was outside the scope of that project, and that our comments should be addressed to the future Lichfield/ Manchester intersection works.

Currently cycling access across this intersection is awkward, particularly travelling south east towards CPIT.  Cyclists have to leave High Street and cross two lanes of traffic on Manchester Street in order to regain the next section of High Street.  Travelling north west also requires a dogleg via Manchester Street to reach High Street.  It would be relatively easy to incorporate cycleways and crossing lights in the area on the north west side of the Manchester/ Lichfield Street intersection in conjunction with the proposed tram route and crossing provisions.  This would significantly improve cycling access in both directions between the two sections of High street.  Better light phasing and more appropriately located cut downs would also improve pedestrian access across the intersection.

We look forward to a positive outcome in respect of these matters.  Don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any queries, or require further information.

Yours sincerely

Rob

Robin Delamore
Cycling Improvements convenor - Spokes